Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.

https://wong-daugaard.hubstack.net/how-to-prevent-electromagnetic-fields-using-clothes-1679568339  (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.

While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther distance from them.

This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for  how to protect from 5g  exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.